for service reasons to abolish it altogether.
With respect to Your Excellency's enggestion that they should be made Clerks to the Registrar I have enquiries and find that
made
find that they have
not been accustomed to assist in the
work in the Registry, except in the manner Dam about to mention and that with the same exception they could not be usefully employed in connection with that office
Hitherto the Cbrief ductice's Clerks has attended the Chief Justice in Chambers for
may be
the
e purpose of taking minutes of judgments
be made there and
or orders which
the Prione Judge's Clerkshar cettended the Puisne Judge
in the Summary Durisdiction Court for alike puspore. It is cloubtful whether in either. case this employment has been striotly legal it being provided
pointed out in Mr Russell's letter that by Sec: 67 sub.
the Code of fivil
00
20:5
5of
Prosedure that " a minute of every
judgment
700
"judgruent whether final or interlocutory " shall be made by the Registrar:"
As also pointed out by Mr. Russell Ordinance No 22 of 1882. Sea : 1 provide
the Court" the appointment of "2 clerk's of though I am told that no- appomtrents
have been made to nomine" and that the duties of a Clerk of the Court are no whore defined by law,
1
am also told that the prezen
- system though of doubtful legality has worked well and that the attendance of one' of the Deputy Registrars to do the work hitherto done by the Judge's
Clark would
- with the ordinary work
greatly interfere wit
of the Registry.
With.
- view of legalising the present
a
system, of acouring to the Judges Clerk- : position in the
in the service, and of permanent position.
retaining at the same time their
personal. relations to the tivo Jerdges respectively I to make the following suggestions . That the Chief Justice's Clerk be
gazetted
beg
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.